Home NY Times Headbutts New Media

NY Times Headbutts New Media


The NY Times reports
that old media won out over new media when it came to World Cup
coverage. The Times notes that television and newspapers benefited from the World Cup,
but seems to overlook (or at least downplay) that Internet services did well too. While
the Times article stated that live video feeds were available in “several countries” and
that mobile coverage was popular in places like Australia, they neglected to quote other
relevant online
stats
. For example
Hitwise reported
that the official Yahoo-Fifa website (which I reviewed a month
ago) ranked No. 68 overall for the week ending June 24, 2006. 

The Times does have a point that new media played “a mostly supplementary role”.
Certainly in terms of video coverage, because if you wanted to watch the matches live
then you had to tune into the major TV networks. But even if Internet coverage of the
World Cup was supplementary to TV, one question which should be asked is: why then didn’t
Old Media take more advantage of the online tools at their disposal? For example, Jeffrey
McManus (no relation) notes that
television networks could easily have made use of desktop widgets:

“It’s interesting because the various widget platforms (not just Yahoo’s) are totally
open. TV networks could be creating these experiences for their audiences without asking
anybody permission or paying the platform providers like Yahoo a cent. Why aren’t
they?”

Perhaps by the time the next World Cup comes around, we’ll not only be able to use
widgets on our desktops – but on the TV. How much better would the TV coverage have been
if we (the audience) had real-time stats and chat options available on the TV set, rather
than our computers? I expect that kind of Web-based technology to be available on TVs in
4 years time.

In any case I think we all agree (apart from the NY Times) that all kinds of media –
old and new – benefited from the World Cup. But rather than butting their heads against
new media, old media should be finding ways to leverage the two-way nature of the Web and
utilize the online tools and services at their disposal.

Photo

About ReadWrite’s Editorial Process

The ReadWrite Editorial policy involves closely monitoring the gambling and blockchain industries for major developments, new product and brand launches, game releases and other newsworthy events. Editors assign relevant stories to in-house staff writers with expertise in each particular topic area. Before publication, articles go through a rigorous round of editing for accuracy, clarity, and to ensure adherence to ReadWrite's style guidelines.

Get the biggest iGaming headlines of the day delivered to your inbox

    By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Gambling News

    Explore the latest in online gambling with our curated updates. We cut through the noise to deliver concise, relevant insights, keeping you informed about the ever-changing world of iGaming and its most important trends.

    In-Depth Strategy Guides

    Elevate your game with tailored strategies for sports betting, table games, slots, and poker. Learn how to maximize bonuses, refine your tactics, and boost your chances to beat the house.

    Unbiased Expert Reviews

    Honest and transparent reviews of sportsbooks, casinos and poker rooms crafted through industry expertise and in-depth analysis. Delve into intricacies, get the best bonus deals, and stay ahead with our trustworthy guides.