A controversial agreement between Germany’s state authorities and online gambling operators has come to light, raising concerns over weakened player protection measures.
Investigations by Investigate Europe, Monitor, and Zeit Online suggest that the deal undermines the Interstate Gambling Treaty, which was designed to prevent problem gambling and financial hardship.
Germany currently enforces a €1,000 ($1,085) monthly deposit cap on online gambling to curb excessive betting. However, exceptions exist for players who can demonstrate financial stability, a process that originally required documentation such as tax returns or bank statements.
Newly surfaced details reveal that a 2022 court settlement quietly altered this safeguard, allowing operators to rely on the Schufa G check instead of more thorough financial assessments.
The issue? The Schufa G check does not provide an accurate measure of an individual’s income or overall financial situation.
As a result, even low-income players have reportedly been able to increase their deposit limits to €10,000 ($10,845).
Criticism from experts and officials
Addiction researchers and policymakers have expressed serious concerns over this regulatory shift.
Tobias Hayer, a gambling addiction expert from the University of Bremen, warned that at-risk gamblers are likely to take advantage of the relaxed rules, increasing their financial strain.
Germany’s addiction and drug policy commissioner, Burkhard Blienert, also condemned the deal, arguing that it prioritizes industry profits over public safety. He criticized the reversal of safeguards, describing the situation as infuriating.
Legal experts have questioned the validity of the agreement, with constitutional law scholar Christoph Degenhart calling for a judicial review to determine whether it violates German law.
Meanwhile, state governments have remained largely silent, directing inquiries to the Joint Gambling Authority of the Federal States (GGL), which is now investigating whether the use of Schufa G aligns with the country’s gambling protection framework.
Bremen’s Interior Minister Ulrich Mäurer has also spoken out against the deal, arguing that it contradicts the core objectives of the Interstate Gambling Treaty.
Industry pushback and future Implications
The gambling industry, however, insists that the agreement was not made in secret. The German Sports Betting Association (DSWV) pointed out that the settlement was part of a public legal process and has been included in official reports since mid-2024.
Nonetheless, the association has acknowledged the need for stronger oversight and, in August 2024, proposed stricter financial monitoring and more frequent credit evaluations to enhance player safety.
As the legal battle over Germany’s gambling regulations intensifies, the debate highlights the ongoing tension between maintaining consumer protections and sustaining industry growth.
