Home Cultural Misunderstandings on the Web

Cultural Misunderstandings on the Web

I’m
really enjoying writing my series on international Web apps and I’ve gotten some great
feedback that others are enjoying it too. The previous post about Russian Web
apps
has gotten the most interest so far, including from some people in Russia who
took issue with it. The comments on my post are
informative, but also Alexey Andreyev wrote an open letter to
me
on the webplanet.ru website. In it he appeared to take offense at my use of the
word “market”, explaining:

“This is quite an ethic problem for me, Richard. Should I help the foreign market
sharks to swallow our poor country the most effective way? Or it would be better to
support some bubble story and steal their green paper before it burns in some other
Russian’s red right hand?”

I have to admit, I think there is a cultural gap here and I don’t fully understand
some of the objections. I appreciate the feedback though, especially the corrections and
suggestions on my post about Russian web apps. So I left a comment on webplanent.ru to
say that my main interest is what kind of web apps people are building in Russia,
rather than the financial market implications. I also noted that I am a New Zealander,
not an American as Alexey’s post implied (although I don’t think it matters much, as a
lot of my readers are American and so I identify strongly with them). My comment did
provoke one amusing reply from a person called JP, who called me “an American cyborg
pretending to be a hobbit” 🙂 I hope it’s not out of line of me to say, but I do think
Russians have a great way with words – as their rich tradition in literature proves.

So I have learned a lesson from all this – even though Web apps across the world are
similar and each country has a lot of their own unique apps too, there are still cultural
issues to work through when making such comparisons. Thanks to all the Russian readers
who left comments on my post and on webplanet.ru, because it certainly helps to have
conversations about these matters.

About ReadWrite’s Editorial Process

The ReadWrite Editorial policy involves closely monitoring the gambling and blockchain industries for major developments, new product and brand launches, game releases and other newsworthy events. Editors assign relevant stories to in-house staff writers with expertise in each particular topic area. Before publication, articles go through a rigorous round of editing for accuracy, clarity, and to ensure adherence to ReadWrite's style guidelines.

Get the biggest iGaming headlines of the day delivered to your inbox

    By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Gambling News

    Explore the latest in online gambling with our curated updates. We cut through the noise to deliver concise, relevant insights, keeping you informed about the ever-changing world of iGaming and its most important trends.

    In-Depth Strategy Guides

    Elevate your game with tailored strategies for sports betting, table games, slots, and poker. Learn how to maximize bonuses, refine your tactics, and boost your chances to beat the house.

    Unbiased Expert Reviews

    Honest and transparent reviews of sportsbooks, casinos and poker rooms crafted through industry expertise and in-depth analysis. Delve into intricacies, get the best bonus deals, and stay ahead with our trustworthy guides.