Home Finding Gatherers (human tag feeds?)

Finding Gatherers (human tag feeds?)

Alf Eaton has come up with a neat little de.icio.us hack. It
lists out the “speediest gatherers” for your del.icio.us page (last 100 items), based on the posting date of
items. I think this means it lists out the people who linked to the same thing as you,
but got there before you did. So the idea is that this list may help you find
people who are interested in the same things as you, but who are faster than you at
linking to them. Potentially then, this could save you the hassle of searching the Web
yourself for those nuggets of information. Just wait for the fast-movers in your
niche to link to them on delicious – kind of like a human version of the topic/tag/remix feeds I’ve
been talking about. Here is my list,
supplied by Alf:

My Gatherers (ricmac)

Quick Analysis

I think one bias to this system is that the more popular a link is, then the more
people will link to it, and thus it’ll likely generate a higher score on your list.
There’ll also be more people on your list, the more you link to popular items. On the
other hand, a high score could flag a person who shares the same niche interests
as you – which is what Alf’s script hopes to eek out. You’ll need to click through to
each person to find out. 

The fact that only four people scored above 2 on my list (and one of them is me!)
indicates that I don’t generally link to popular items. Either that, or I’m very fast on
the uptake – which I know is not true! 

Take a look at this list for a
delicious user called acidzebra, to see the difference.

acidzebra’s Gatherers

[…plus a heap of others with score of 2 or less]

Postscript, 4/2/05: I lost the last two paragraphs of this post, because MT
couldn’t handle the length of it. But what I had written was that if you check out acidzebra’s delicious page, you’ll
see that it includes a lot of items with 100+ links (the deeper the red of the highlights, the
more popular an item is). So this I think accounts for the relative high scores on his Gatherers list, as well as its length.

About ReadWrite’s Editorial Process

The ReadWrite Editorial policy involves closely monitoring the tech industry for major developments, new product launches, AI breakthroughs, video game releases and other newsworthy events. Editors assign relevant stories to staff writers or freelance contributors with expertise in each particular topic area. Before publication, articles go through a rigorous round of editing for accuracy, clarity, and to ensure adherence to ReadWrite's style guidelines.

Get the biggest tech headlines of the day delivered to your inbox

    By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Tech News

    Explore the latest in tech with our Tech News. We cut through the noise for concise, relevant updates, keeping you informed about the rapidly evolving tech landscape with curated content that separates signal from noise.

    In-Depth Tech Stories

    Explore tech impact in In-Depth Stories. Narrative data journalism offers comprehensive analyses, revealing stories behind data. Understand industry trends for a deeper perspective on tech's intricate relationships with society.

    Expert Reviews

    Empower decisions with Expert Reviews, merging industry expertise and insightful analysis. Delve into tech intricacies, get the best deals, and stay ahead with our trustworthy guide to navigating the ever-changing tech market.