Home Why Facebook’s WhatsApp Deal Is Bad For Users

Why Facebook’s WhatsApp Deal Is Bad For Users

In Facebook’s $19 billion purchase of WhatsApp, the world’s most popular messaging application, it’s easy to see who comes out on top. Less clear is who will wind up getting the shaft, though it seems highly likely that WhatsApp’s users are going to come out on the losing end.

The deal nets the social network a fast-growing, international user base and some street cred in the burgeoning global-messaging market, where Facebook had long been a marginal player. It also takes out a social competitor that one day could have potentially threatened Facebook’s dominance. And while $19 billion is a breathtaking sum—it’s the largest venture-backed acquisition in history—it’s still eminently affordable for the social giant.

See also: How Social Giants Are Trying To Take Over Your Text Messages

WhatsApp investors, founders and employees stand to benefit handsomely as well, not least because Facebook will dispense restricted stock grants worth $3 billion to keep its talent around.

WhatsApp’s users, meanwhile, are about to become part of the Facebook product, whether they like it or not.

Privacy Concerns

Both Facebook and WhatsApp insist that the deal won’t change anything where WhatsApp messaging is concerned. In particular, they insist that WhatsApp will operate independently of Facebook and that it’ll stay free of advertising.

There’s no reason to doubt the former point, at least in the short term. Facebook made a similar promise almost two years ago when it bought Instagram, and it’s still so independent from Facebook that the only way to tell Instagram belongs to the social network is to visit its help pages.

On the other hand, the one major change Facebook brought to the photo-sharing service is that its users now see ads. Of course, WhatsApp has long been militant about its no-advertising stance, even featuring this quote from Fight Club on its home page

Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don’t need.
—Tyler Durden, Fight Club

You have to wonder how well that goes down with the advertising machine that Facebook has become.

But the issue for WhatsApp’s 450 million monthly users—a group both companies say is growing by a million registered users every day—goes well beyond advertising. Those users may not realize they’re about to be sharing their online conversations with Facebook. Some might not care, but anyone who flocked to WhatsApp precisely because it didn’t seem to want to know everything about them will likely be miffed.

WhatsApp is a free download from most mobile app stores, but the service itself isn’t free. In order to stay ad-free, WhatsApp charges users 99 cents a year for the service, with a free year thrown in up front.

See also: Facebook Is Trying To Integrate With Everything

And now that the service belongs to Facebook, users won’t be paying with just money, but also with their personal information.

Facebook has access to all of WhatsApp’s data—users’ phone numbers, address books, and payment information. Facebook was previously unable to tap these resources unless people connected their address books to Facebook Messenger, or provided Facebook with credit card information to donate to various non-profits. 

It’s easy to distrust Facebook, especially since the company has a history of playing fast and loose with user privacy and collecting information it wasn’t supposed to. In the past year alone, Facebook killed a privacy setting in order to expand the reach of its search feature, updated its privacy policy to explicitly reserve the right to feature its users’ names and profile pictures in ads and faced an accusation that it scrapes data from private messages to better serve advertisers (a charge the company says is “without merit”).

Now Facebook has access to even more personal data—specifically, information that many users wouldn’t willingly give up before. In return, people get better-tailored advertising and, potentially, the ability pay for things on Facebook. That may strike some, even most, WhatsApp users as a fair trade, though you have to wonder.

Growing Global

You can see why Facebook, which still hankers to “connect the world,” was so anxious to close this deal. More than a billion people already use Facebook, and it’s aiming to get the next billion users through global expansion, specifically in developing countries and those with growing economies.

According to a report released in November 2013, WhatsApp dominates the mobile messaging market in the U.S., Brazil, South Africa, Indonesia and China, surpassing runner-up Facebook Messenger in those markets. 

Facebook wanted to buy a true messaging app to complement Facebook Messenger, and WhatsApp was the obvious choice thanks to the simple utility and skyrocketing global popularity.

“Messenger evolved from Facebook chat which was more instant messaging, not SMS … a lot of messages aren’t real-time. WhatsApp evolved from the model of replacing SMS,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on a conference call on Wednesday afternoon. “Those are two pretty big and different use cases and the world needs both.”

Own Your Phonebook, Own Your Social Life

The rise of mobile messaging platforms like WhatsApp, Snapchat and Kik suggests that consumers find it relatively easy to adopt new messaging services that fit their fancy, simply because it’s easy to connect to their friends via their phone’s contact list and chat away.

Until now, no social network could be an all-purpose messaging service because no social network had an SMS replacement. Most social networks are purely social identity managers. As WhatsApp falls into the Facebook fold, though, you can bet that the preeminent social network hopes to build it into a messaging application that dominates its rivals.

See also: Is Facebook The Last Great Social Network?

But marketplace dominance does a disservice to users when one major company keeps snatching up its competitors. We don’t know how WhatsApp’s data will affect what Facebook wants to build next, but anytime you diminish competition you also diminish innovation, which is both bad for users and developers.

Lead image by Madeleine Weiss for ReadWrite

About ReadWrite’s Editorial Process

The ReadWrite Editorial policy involves closely monitoring the tech industry for major developments, new product launches, AI breakthroughs, video game releases and other newsworthy events. Editors assign relevant stories to staff writers or freelance contributors with expertise in each particular topic area. Before publication, articles go through a rigorous round of editing for accuracy, clarity, and to ensure adherence to ReadWrite's style guidelines.

Get the biggest tech headlines of the day delivered to your inbox

    By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Tech News

    Explore the latest in tech with our Tech News. We cut through the noise for concise, relevant updates, keeping you informed about the rapidly evolving tech landscape with curated content that separates signal from noise.

    In-Depth Tech Stories

    Explore tech impact in In-Depth Stories. Narrative data journalism offers comprehensive analyses, revealing stories behind data. Understand industry trends for a deeper perspective on tech's intricate relationships with society.

    Expert Reviews

    Empower decisions with Expert Reviews, merging industry expertise and insightful analysis. Delve into tech intricacies, get the best deals, and stay ahead with our trustworthy guide to navigating the ever-changing tech market.