Home Google & Verizon Propose Enforceable Net Neutrality

Google & Verizon Propose Enforceable Net Neutrality

Google and Verizon held a press call today announcing a joint legislative framework proposal: internet network transparency and FCC enforcement with up to $2 million fines for network providers that engage in anti-competitive measures that hurt consumers. This is the exact opposite of what reports last week speculated the companies were working on. (Note: broadband specialists and other press are very skeptical, see below.)

Under the proposal, the General Accounting Office would report yearly to congress about how well it all is working. Verizon said the company was concerned that too many rules up front could infringe on its ability to optimize the network for performance, but that some rules are clearly needed and transparency is important. “There will be no prioritization of traffic from Google over the internet, period,” Verizon’s CEO Ivan Seidenberg said today. “No paid prioritization of traffic over the public internet.”

In theory private networks could be built to sell special services, but Google’s Schmidt said that Google will not do that. “We like the public internet,” he said, “and we intend to use it.”

On getting a return on investment in broadband: Verizon’s Seidenberg said that Google has far more ideas about how to monetize and grow the public internet than Verizon had in its original understanding [of the internet, apparently].

Both companies are talking the innovation-talk, saying that fat, unfettered pipes will lead to more innovation that will make the pie bigger for everyone involved.

Press cynicism runs deep, though, and questions about loopholes and dark hidden intentions are still being asked. Probably rightly so, but executives on the call sound really annoyed that people are still looking for “conspiracy theories” while they believe they are offering good faith statements for the good of the internet.

There has been no mention yet of an internet browsing brain implant to be offered by either company. Wireless networks aren’t included in the prohibitions, just wireline networks, though transparency would be required for all of the above. See Cecilia Kang’s coverage at The Washington Post to read a perspective that says this is bad news. See also broadband expert Karl Bode’s commentary on Twitter. Susan Crawford’s analysis looks strong: that these two companies filled a vacuum that the FCC needs to step into and show leadership in. That sounds good, if you trust the FCC to do the right thing.

More analysis coming, the document is embedded below.

Verizon-Google Legislative Framework Proposal

About ReadWrite’s Editorial Process

The ReadWrite Editorial policy involves closely monitoring the tech industry for major developments, new product launches, AI breakthroughs, video game releases and other newsworthy events. Editors assign relevant stories to staff writers or freelance contributors with expertise in each particular topic area. Before publication, articles go through a rigorous round of editing for accuracy, clarity, and to ensure adherence to ReadWrite's style guidelines.

Get the biggest tech headlines of the day delivered to your inbox

    By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Tech News

    Explore the latest in tech with our Tech News. We cut through the noise for concise, relevant updates, keeping you informed about the rapidly evolving tech landscape with curated content that separates signal from noise.

    In-Depth Tech Stories

    Explore tech impact in In-Depth Stories. Narrative data journalism offers comprehensive analyses, revealing stories behind data. Understand industry trends for a deeper perspective on tech's intricate relationships with society.

    Expert Reviews

    Empower decisions with Expert Reviews, merging industry expertise and insightful analysis. Delve into tech intricacies, get the best deals, and stay ahead with our trustworthy guide to navigating the ever-changing tech market.