Home The First Principle of Social Web Apps and its Implications

The First Principle of Social Web Apps and its Implications

I’m attending Supernova this year and will
be covering the event for Read/WriteWeb. In addition to attending various panels, I
participated in the conference today by giving a quick presentation as part of the
challenge roundtable at the end of the first day. My topic was titled: The First
Principle of Social Web Apps and Its Implications.
A number of individuals asked me
for the slides I referenced, if you’re interested I have posted them here as either PowerPoint
Presentation
or PDF.

Introduction

Right at the beginning of applying for my research fellowship at Carnegie Mellon
University, I had the opportunity to interact with the Nobel Prize winning economist Herb Simon. One of the things he said
that had a huge impact on me was that ‘winning a nobel prize is easy, you just need to
focus on the right questions to answer.’
As I’ve moved from academia into the
business community, the lesson has still been great guidance — I always try to make sure
I’m focused on solving the right problems.

Reflecting on the state of social web applications, I think as an industry we’re still
figuring out what questions should be asked. My presentation at Supernova was an attempt
to frame some of those questions by establishing a ‘first principle’ for social
web applications.

First Principles

First, it’s important to review exactly what I’m talking about. ‘First principles’ are
the building blocks on top of which complex solutions are built. A few good examples of
first principles being used in larger solutions are boolean algebra as a basis for
the microprocessor and airfoil as the
basis for jet flight. Both of these fundamental theories were later applied to invent
literally world changing solutions.

I believe there is an equally fundamental first principle of social web
applications,
which is:

For each ‘complete’ user interaction …

the user must perceive they have received more value than the energy (and attention)
expended to complete the task.

On one level this principle is very obvious, because basic human nature seems to prove
it. People won’t continue to engage in acts they believe are more expensive then the
value they are receiving in return. What I think is important is that users must perceive
the ratio of energy and attention spent versus value received to be ‘profitable.’ The
ratio is actually more important then the absolute amount of value delivered. This is
probably best explained by an example.

Example Twitter

Value

This year at SXSW I went from skeptic to passionate Twitter user.
Before experiencing SXSW, I didn’t get why people would want to broadcast very short
messages about themselves to a community of followers. It honestly felt like a valueless
experience and therefore I hadn’t created a Twitter account. However, I went to SXSW and
wanted to find the best places to drink Shiner Bock (err … best panels to attend).
Twitter did a great job of connecting me with other attendees. After experiencing the
value at SXSW, I ended up coming up with lots of other ways that I could use Twitter. In
each case, the energy to setup and complete the interaction was less then the energy and
attention I was spending to complete it.

I personally have found 3 common uses from Twitter each that deliver value to me:

  • Short messages to your friends “what are you doing?”
  • Networking at events
  • Self-promotion

Energy Expended

While I’m now a loyal Twitter user who really sees a lot of value in the application,
what I think is important is how easy it is to start experiencing this value.
Therefore, the perceived value delivered (in this case finding free beer) didn’t have to
be that high. There are other services which require significantly more energy and
attention to use, and therefore based on the first principle they have to deliver
a much higher perceived value.

While there are certain things you can do to lower the energy required, such as:

  • integrating with Open ID to make account creation
    easier
  • simplifying your interactions and
  • opening up / integrating with other services (such as Facebook)

However, ultimately you need to focus on clearly delivering enough value to your users
in each of their interactions. While there certainly are specialist you can turn to for
help (we an HCI experts at my company), this needs to be the mission of everyone involved
in product design and development.

Design Implications

Thinking about the implications of my proposed first principle , I think there
are three types of interactions that we should focus on when creating social web
applications. In each case, the interaction needs to be delivering more value to a user
then the energy they are exerting. This can be achieved across three basic types of
interactions:

  1. New interactions users find valuable
  2. Returning significantly more value to the user with the same interaction
  3. Returning the same or slightly more value significantly more efficiently

Network Effect

It seems like the most common violation of this first principle is in the area of
applications that require a network effect before they are successful. While the value
may evolve as they site grows, each interaction needs to deliver value back to the user
participating at that point of scaling.

Example: Wikipedia

Interestingly, I used to look at wikipedia as an example of a site where they seemed
to violate this principle for those who create entries. However, an experience I recently
had actually made me realize they do a good job creating a positive value exchange even
for the act of creating new entries.

Recently I searched for ‘behavioral targeting‘ in
wikipedia and didn’t find any entries. While I’m sure many had left at this point, I
instead realized this was a great opportunity to contribute a piece to wikipedia and
continue to work to establish myself as someone knowledgeable in the field of delivering
targeted ads on the web. So I created an account with them and created the entry. This
was six months ago, reviewing the history
I see that 36 people have edited that entry including most recently (today 6/20) the
director of behavioral targeting for Yahoo. Through this experience, I’ve realized they
do indeed satisfy the first principle across all types of interactions.

Conclusion

So I opened this post talking about the need to be focused on the right questions. The
question that I proposed we focus on at Supernova today based on the first principle laid
out in this post is:

Are your interactions delivering enough value to your users?

The presentation was well received at Supernova, what do you think … is this the
right question to focus on? What do you think of my first principle? I’ll try to monitor
the comment stream below.

About ReadWrite’s Editorial Process

The ReadWrite Editorial policy involves closely monitoring the tech industry for major developments, new product launches, AI breakthroughs, video game releases and other newsworthy events. Editors assign relevant stories to staff writers or freelance contributors with expertise in each particular topic area. Before publication, articles go through a rigorous round of editing for accuracy, clarity, and to ensure adherence to ReadWrite's style guidelines.

Get the biggest tech headlines of the day delivered to your inbox

    By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Tech News

    Explore the latest in tech with our Tech News. We cut through the noise for concise, relevant updates, keeping you informed about the rapidly evolving tech landscape with curated content that separates signal from noise.

    In-Depth Tech Stories

    Explore tech impact in In-Depth Stories. Narrative data journalism offers comprehensive analyses, revealing stories behind data. Understand industry trends for a deeper perspective on tech's intricate relationships with society.

    Expert Reviews

    Empower decisions with Expert Reviews, merging industry expertise and insightful analysis. Delve into tech intricacies, get the best deals, and stay ahead with our trustworthy guide to navigating the ever-changing tech market.