Home Living Data & The Momentum of Webfeeds

Living Data & The Momentum of Webfeeds

I’m exploring the Design for Data thread and later in this post I’m going to get arty
on ya’ll. I think tomorrow I’ll begin to investigate Atomflow, but for now
let me give you an informal overview of my thoughts so far: 

– it’s about movement of data/content (in time); not places where
data/content resides. A word that I’ve been noticinglately, which I think sums
this up nicely, is momentum. Portability is another word I like: not tied to one
place.

Design for Data is about the user being in control of their webfeeds (RSS and
Atom). Whereas the reality circa 2004 is that it’s still mostly the content producer that
has control over feeds.

Think about it – blogging is currently more people-centric than
topic-centric, because you’re subscribing to a person and you generally can’t filter out
the content that you don’t want to read from that person. What if you, the user,
could aggregate feeds from people but only view the topics you want, or automatically
filter content according to your tastes? This is something developers are
beginning to explore now
and it’s basically all about giving control of data/content
back to the user.

– Design for Data is about DYI websites for the users. If you can aggregate
your own content from a variety of sources, then does that mean a complete overhaul of
what a “website” is? Traditionally
a website is a “place”, but increasingly it’s about taking bits of content from movable
webfeeds and making your own “place” to consume them. You and I have RSS Aggregators and
our weblogs for this purpose, but Yahoo! sees this as an opportunity to be ‘the
place’ where ordinary people aggregate their content. And they’re going to mix in
music and other multimedia too.

– It’s all about Information
Flow
. And it’s going to affect a lot of content creation industries.

– And it’s also about Rip, Mix n’ Burn. Re-using content is going to be where a lot of
current “consumers” find their value in the webfeed system. Whether it be music, podcasts,
other audio, multimedia, or just plain old text – it’s all there to be re-mixed (putting
the painful legal stuff aside for now!).

Web of Ideas. That’s a
phrase I’ve long been attracted to and Design for Data is bringing us closer. As Joshua Portercommented recently:
“The more we rip content away from visual style and present it in different contexts, the
more we get closer to pure ideas. That is the goal, isn’t it?” Indeed! p.s. I must read
Nova Spivack’sThe Physics of Ideas – that’s
sort of what Joshua and I have been rapping about (found via The Grandmaster Flash of
Meme Rapping, Marc
Canter
).

Visual design is a package for our data/content, but we want to make it
easier for users to get at the kernels of truth via webfeeds!

There’s much more, but I’m still exploring… now for an artsy-fartsy segue.

The red shed

I was feeling a bit down today. Being so far away from all the conferences and other Web events makes me feel
sorry for myself sometimes. Which is why I can’t understand all these disaffected
US liberals
who want to move to New Zealand – are you crazy? Webfeeds and ideas may
be free to roam about the world, but the people who matter in the Web industry are
still by and large in one place: America. You can’t get anywhere in this world
without F2F with your peers.

Anyways, at lunchtime I walked over to Te Papa, the national museum of New Zealand, to
draw some inspiration from an exhibition of New Zealand artists (some pxts here).

This one painting, by Toss
Woollaston, caught my eye because in a way it expressed what I’m thinking about with Design for Data. Here’s the blurb which accompanied it:

“This orchard near Nelson was where Woollaston worked during the early 1940s. His
landscapes are more a response to his surroundings than a literal depiction of them. He
said he wanted to ‘invent new strategies for reproducing not nature, but the emotions
felt before nature.'”

I’m not sure if there is a connection… however one phrase I read later that was
applied to this kind of painting (a form of expressionism I think, but I’m no art
historian) is ‘living paint’. There’s a fusion between the oil paint and nature – and so the paint becomes
‘alive’.

So too data (words, music, whatever is your preferred format) becomes ‘alive’ in webfeeds, in the sense that it moves, interacts with the world and is malleable…and produces ideas. So I think what I mean when I talk about Design for Data is ‘living data’. Webfeeds (RSS
and Atom primarily) are making content come alive to us.

About ReadWrite’s Editorial Process

The ReadWrite Editorial policy involves closely monitoring the tech industry for major developments, new product launches, AI breakthroughs, video game releases and other newsworthy events. Editors assign relevant stories to staff writers or freelance contributors with expertise in each particular topic area. Before publication, articles go through a rigorous round of editing for accuracy, clarity, and to ensure adherence to ReadWrite's style guidelines.

Get the biggest tech headlines of the day delivered to your inbox

    By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Tech News

    Explore the latest in tech with our Tech News. We cut through the noise for concise, relevant updates, keeping you informed about the rapidly evolving tech landscape with curated content that separates signal from noise.

    In-Depth Tech Stories

    Explore tech impact in In-Depth Stories. Narrative data journalism offers comprehensive analyses, revealing stories behind data. Understand industry trends for a deeper perspective on tech's intricate relationships with society.

    Expert Reviews

    Empower decisions with Expert Reviews, merging industry expertise and insightful analysis. Delve into tech intricacies, get the best deals, and stay ahead with our trustworthy guide to navigating the ever-changing tech market.