<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
        <channel>
        <title>customer information - ReadWrite</title>
        <link>http://readwrite.com</link>
        <description />
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012 SAY Media, Inc.</copyright>
        <managingEditor>readwriteweb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:05:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://rww.superfeedr.com/" />

                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Social Capital: How Relationship Science Captures It All]]></title>
                <description><![CDATA[
                                        <img src="http://readwrite.com/files/styles/800_450sc/public/fields/relsciteam_0.JPG" />
                                        <p>One of the big promises of social networking is that it will inject your networking skills with PED (performance enhancing data), able to give you the biggest network on the block. If you're a believer in the raw power of oh-so many social connections, that's OK. But if you're like me, you'll already hearing Janet Jackson's hit, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9uizdKZAGE" target="_blank">What Have You Done For Me Lately?</a> playing in your head.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The problem with most social media is that the quality of your network degenerates as it grows. At first, best friends and business connections are added. Only to be followed by many requests from friends with few benefits. That sentiment may be harsh but in this day and age of <a href="http://www.michaeltchong.com/time-compression/" target="_blank">Time Compression</a>, the greatest value of business networking lies in its ability to improve daily dealings.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, as I'm sure you've already discovered, many of your "extremely well-connected" network contacts turn out to be, more often than not, less than stellar. So expect the next generation of social networks to devote a lot more attention to the purview of <em>social capital</em>.</p>
<h2>Doing It The Analog Way</h2>
<p>One company that provides a peek into the future of social networking is New York-based <a href="https://www.relsci.com" target="_blank">Relationship Science</a>, a company founded by Neal Goldman, who reportedly raised the first $3 million of his $60 million investment in just three days.</p>
<p>Relationship Science has built the ultimate business Who's Who directory, relying on a <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/11/a-database-of-names-and-how-they-connect/" target="_blank">staff of more than 800 people</a>, located mostly in India. The data gathered over the past two years is derived strictly from publicly available information, Relationship Science CMO Josh Mait tells me.</p>
<p>What sets the company apart from most online directories is its interface. As Mait describes it, Relationship Science offers "institutional grade data in a consumer-friendly interface."</p>
<p>To use the data effectively you need to identify people you know well. Once your relationships are tagged, the system will show your total number of first-degree connections, which in Mait's case was about 18,000 connections produced by just 50 tagged relationships.</p>
<p><span class="embedded-Media-image img-caption-c">
				<img src="http://readwrite.com/files/RelSci-iPad-Pathfinder-598x480.jpg" style="" />
				<span class="embedded-Media-image-caption">Relationship Science has cataloged millions of people and organized their affinities, connections and special interests in the ultimate networking directory, also conveniently available via iPad, as this image demonstrates.</span>
		</span>
</p>
<h2>Finding A Path</h2>
<p>One of the most powerful features of Relationship Science is Path Finder, which lets you visually see how you're connected to someone else, say for example, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz. Relationship links are color-coded as either strong, average or weak.</p>
<p>These relationships are based on many data elements, including education, memberships, interests, affiliations, career, boards, committees, non-profit donations, public holdings, awards and events. Anyone in sales will really appreciate this level of data granularity, all delivered in a simple interface.</p>
<p>Mait adds, "Our investors invested in the product because they saw themselves in it, networking is how they became successful." I truly believe that social networks like Linked In could learn from Relationship Science, although the company vigorously denies that it's a social network or a "traditional CRM system."</p>
<p>I predict that a lot of social innovation will come in the area of superior connection building. The watchword of the future being "social capital." People who blow other people off without communication will in the very near future be anonymously rated by their social media peers.</p>
<p>And those ratings will pop up in social capital databases that everyone will tap into. We can't wait to see how this futuristic science of relationships helps us all perform better. Until then, I suggest you spend $3,000 a year on Relationship Science. There's no better way to get to Howard Schultz.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Images via Relationship Science.</em></p>
<p><em><strong>Editors Note:</strong> A previous version of this story incorrectly noted the cost of the Relationship Science service as $3000/month. It is actually $3000/year, and the article has been updated to reflect that amount.</em></p>
                    ]]></description>
                <link>http://readwrite.com/2013/03/11/social-capital-how-relationship-science-captures-it-all</link>
                <guid>http://readwrite.com/2013/03/11/social-capital-how-relationship-science-captures-it-all</guid>
                <category>Social Networks</category>
                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:05:00 -0700</pubDate>
                <author>Michael Tchong</author>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Warning: Mom-And-Pop Shops Not Safe From Cybercriminals]]></title>
                <description><![CDATA[
                                        <img src="http://readwrite.com/files/styles/800_450sc/public/fields/shutterstock_89227171_0.jpg" />
                                        <p class="p1">Sure, cybercrime headlines go to multinational conglomerates that are breached by determined, sophisticated criminals. But small firms get hit more often, a fact that no doubt surprises their owners and customers.</p>
<p class="p1">Mom-and-pops often take fewer precautions, and when their customers also let down their guard, they all become easy prey. It might be more time-consuming to string together access to a lot of small businesses, but the prize – fat consumer financial accounts – is just as valuable as any stolen from big firms.</p>
<h2 class="p2">Security Polices Are Lacking</h2>
<p class="p1">A <a href="http://www.staysafeonline.org/download/datasets/4389/2012_ncsa_symantec_small_business_study.pdf">recent survey</a> of more than 1,000 businesses with less than 250 employees shows that nine in 10 have no formal policies guiding employees on how to avoid malicious sites that download malware. Commissioned by the <a href="http://www.staysafeonline.org/">National Cyber Security Alliance</a> and <a href="http://www.symantec.com/index.jsp">Symantec,</a> the poll also found that more than seven in 10 respondents have no guidelines for using Facebook, Twitter and other social media where cybercriminals will hijack accounts to distribute malicious links.</p>
<p class="p1">Privacy polices were also lacking. The survey found that 60% of the businesses had no guidelines for employees to follow regarding customer or employee information.</p>
<h2 class="p2">The Security Risks Are Obvious</h2>
<p class="p1">Oddly, small-business owners understand the importance of Internet security.</p>
<p class="p1">Fully 73% said using the Internet safely was critical to their business, and 46% acknowledged it was very critical. In fact, nearly nine in 10 had one or more employees using the Internet for daily operations, with seven in 10 saying they were either somewhat or very dependent on the Internet for running their company.</p>
<p class="p1">Nevertheless, nearly 60% of the businesses had no contingency for handling a loss of customer or employee data, credit or debit numbers or intellectual property. Yet, nearly seven in 10 manage their own sites in-house, meaning if there's trouble, the small business is liable.</p>
<h2 class="p2">Size Doesn't Matter</h2>
<p class="p1">So why the disconnect? Michael Kaiser, executive director of security alliance, said small businesses believe hackers are more interested in breaking into large companies that would seem to have much more valuable information.</p>
<p class="p1">"They may think their size protects them," Kaiser said.</p>
<p class="p1">What many small businesses don't realize is that hackers value information no matter the size of the company. They want names and passwords of employees' email accounts in order to identify customers and send them malware or links to malicious sites.</p>
<p class="p1">Small businesses “may not understand how the cybercriminal system works," he said. "A list of 200 customers may be incredibly valuable."</p>
<p class="p1">Of course, not all small businesses operate the same way. Those working with defense and financial firms are used to tighter security requirements, for example. More small businesses will have to upgrade to similar levels.</p>
<h2 class="p2">The Easy Pickings</h2>
<p class="p1">Software powering electronic cash registers is a popular target. Last December, four Romanians <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/romanians-subway-hack/">were indicted</a> in U.S. federal court for allegedly stealing credit-, debit- and gift-card numbers from the point-of-sale systems at 150 Subway restaurants and more than 50 other franchise and small retailers. The suspects were accused of charging millions of dollars to the accounts of 80,000 customers.</p>
<p class="p1">Chester Wisniewski, senior security adviser for anti-virus software vendor Sophos, said small businesses tend to fall behind in software updates that patch security flaws.</p>
<p class="p1">"A small business is a target that doesn't necessarily have any better security than my mom and dad," Wisniewski said.</p>
<p class="p1">Weak security by small businesses <a href="http://blog.visa.com/tag/smb/">accounts for </a>90% of the payment data breaches reported to Visa. A study by Verizon <a href="http://www.verizonbusiness.com/resources/reports/rp_data-breach-investigations-report-2012_en_xg.pdf">found that</a> nearly three-quarters of data breaches in 2011 involved businesses with fewer than 100 employees.</p>
<h2 class="p2">Share As Little Data As Possible</h2>
<p class="p1">Put all the facts together and a person would be wise to share as little personal information as possible with a small business.</p>
<p class="p1">All business owners should consider the case of hotelier Wyndham Worldwide. It <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/258327/ftc_files_lawsuit_over_data_breaches_at_large_hotel_operator.html">was sued this year</a> by the Federal Trade Commission for failing to have adequate security to prevent the theft of payment card information of hundreds of thousands of customers.</p>
<p class="p1">There’s nothing to say a small firm can’t be victimized and then sued.</p>
<p class="p1">"I wouldn't store my credit card with anyone," Wisniewski said.</p>
                    ]]></description>
                <link>http://readwrite.com/2012/10/23/warning-mom-and-pop-shops-not-safe-from-cybercriminals</link>
                <guid>http://readwrite.com/2012/10/23/warning-mom-and-pop-shops-not-safe-from-cybercriminals</guid>
                <category>cybercrime</category>
                <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
                <author>Antone Gonsalves</author>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>

