<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
        <channel>
        <title>Forrester - ReadWrite</title>
        <link>http://readwrite.com</link>
        <description />
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012 SAY Media, Inc.</copyright>
        <managingEditor>readwriteweb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 05:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://rww.superfeedr.com/" />

                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Cloud Is Officially Boring. Finally]]></title>
                <description><![CDATA[
                                        <img src="http://readwrite.com/files/styles/800_450sc/public/fields/CloudBoring.jpg" />
                                        <p>It's official: the cloud is boring. While some of you already felt like cloud was BOA (boring on arrival), the reality is that it's been causing all sorts of headaches within the enterprise. Until now.</p>
<p>As Forrester analyst <a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/james_staten/13-04-16-openstack_goes_grizzly_azure_iaas_goes_live_no_big_deal_good">James Staten suggests</a>, new product announcements from both OpenStack and Microsoft Azure got a muted yawn this past week, which is a Very Good Thing, as he explains:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"[H]o-hum releases like these are signs of maturity that signal to enterprises that it’s now okay to invest. Let’s face it. Most enterprises are conservative. We don’t like to be first with any new, risky technology. That’s why we wait for the 2.1 release before trying something new... We’d like other companies to work all the kinks out of the system, live through all the stability issues and fix all the bugs so we can get a solid release to work with." &nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As much as people have tried to hype the cloud over the years, hype is precisely the opposite of what was needed to make cloud mainstream. As such, it's arguably a great sign that cloud is about to surrender the hype crown to Big Data, at least as <a href="http://www.google.com/trends/explore?hl=en-US#q=big+data,+cloud+computing&amp;date=1/2009+52m">measured by Google searches</a>&nbsp;(as <a href="http://timoelliott.com/blog/2013/04/big-data-poised-to-take-over-from-cloud-computing-in-searches.html">pointed out by Timo Elliott</a>):</p>
<p><span class="embedded-Media-image img-caption-c">
				<img src="http://readwrite.com/files/Screen%20Shot%202013-04-17%20at%209.47.42%20AM.png" style="" />
			</span>
</p>
<p>It's about time. As a <a href="http://www.ioug.org/d/do/2897">Unisphere survey</a>&nbsp;(PDF) of Oracle users indicates, cloud is becoming strategic within the enterprise, and much more pervasive. As the survey reveals, 37% of enterprise managers are running or piloting private clouds, which is a jump from 29% two years ago. More significantly, an additional 26% &nbsp;use public cloud services for enterprise applications, a big boost from 14%.&nbsp;</p>
<p>This jibes with a new <a href="https://live.barcap.com/PRC/servlets/dv.search?contentDocID=FC103158217&amp;bcllink=decode">Barclays survey of 100 CIOs</a>, which found them piling into the cloud. Indeed, cloud, second only to Big Data, topped the list of IT spending drivers:</p>
<p><span class="embedded-Media-image img-caption-c">
				<img src="http://readwrite.com/files/Screen%20Shot%202013-04-17%20at%209.37.37%20AM.png" style="" />
			</span>
</p>
<p>In sum, for years we've known that cloud computing would be big. But that's not what CIOs needed to hear. They needed to know that it could also be boring. We have arrived!</p>
                    ]]></description>
                <link>http://readwrite.com/2013/04/18/the-cloud-is-officially-boring-finally</link>
                <guid>http://readwrite.com/2013/04/18/the-cloud-is-officially-boring-finally</guid>
                <category>cloud</category>
                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 05:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
                <author>Matt Asay</author>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Forrester: Enterprises Must Look To Web For Mobile Success]]></title>
                <description><![CDATA[
                                        <img src="http://readwrite.com/files/styles/800_450sc/public/fields/shutterstock_mobileenterprise.jpg" />
                                        <p>The enterprise has always been buttoned-down, conservative. And that's a good thing. Let the wacky Web crowd dabble in new-school technologies. Eventually they'll be back, begging for a white paper or two to explain best practices of green screens and mainframes. Right?</p>
<p>Not even close. As Forrester analysts <a href="https://twitter.com/jhammond">Jeffrey Hammond</a> and Julie Ask highlight in a new report, "<a href="http://www.forrester.com/The+Future+Of+Mobile+Application+Development/fulltext/-/E-RES89181">The Future Of Mobile Application Development</a>," enterprises must embrace mobile to succeed, with mobile development requiring modern development techniques and technologies like elastic infrastructure, open source and DevOps. &nbsp;With over one billion smartphones globally, a number that keeps booming, they argue "We’re entering a new age of application development that creates modern, compelling systems of engagement and links them with systems of record and systems of operation."</p>
<p>The problem is keeping pace:</p>
<blockquote>"As companies target more devices and platforms when building modern applications, client-side development costs will increase. At the same time, they will need to deploy releases faster than ever. The only way to survive this Catch-22 is to lower the cost of testing new ideas and make it quicker and cheaper to separate the good ideas from the bad."</blockquote>
<h2>Looking For Solutions</h2>
<p>Hammond and Ask aren't alone in pointing to this enterprise quandary, even within Forrester. Indeed, the need for flexible development is top of mind across the analyst firm, with analyst <a href="https://www.salesforce.com/assets/pdf/misc/CIO_Perspectives_On_App_D.pdf">Mike Gualtieri arguing</a> that "Traditional application development platforms such as Java and .NET are not necessarily the fastest approaches to develop applications. CIOs should investigate application development productivity platforms that make application development professionals more productive." And faster.</p>
<p>Like what?</p>
<p>In listing out elements of a successful mobile development strategy, Hammond and Ask point to a few essential technologies or technology approaches:</p>
<ul>
<li>RESTful APIs that are asynchronous and can be consumed across multiple channels;</li>
<li>In-memory databases;</li>
<li>Open-source software...everywhere (lowers barriers to try new approaches);</li>
<li>Shared SQL databases and NoSQL databases (commodity hardware; scale-out architecture);</li>
<li>Dynamic languages (e.g., PHP, Django) in concert with static languages like Java and .NET;</li>
<li>Lightweight process communication frameworks like node.js and nginx (reduces resource consumption, among other things).</li>
</ul>
<p>Each of the above elements contributes to a much more iterative, agile approach to development. I'd probably also add HTML5, as building native-only applications makes it harder to iterate an application and adds significantly more cost (up to 30%, according to Forrester's analysis). For enterprises who think these things nudge them toward acting more like their Web peers, the answer is "Yes." Just as the <a href="http://readwrite.com/2013/01/07/trickle-down-web-innovation-breathing-new-life-into-enterprise-it">Web has gifted innovation like Hadoop to the enterprise</a> so, too, is it paving the way for enhanced mobile development.</p>
<h2>Here Comes The Future</h2>
<p>It's almost trite to say it, but mobile is the future of computing, whether for the consumer or in the enterprise. As such, enterprises need to emulate the best of modern consumer Web approaches. The alternative, according to Forrester, is not pleasant: "Ignore these structural and business model changes and you risk creating a new generation of stovepiped mobile apps that are hard to maintain and ill-equipped for the changes that are just over the horizon."</p>
<p>Enterprise CIOs needn't panic, though. They have time. &nbsp;</p>
<p>As Forrester points out, the attributes of successful mobile development they cite are being used by leading mobile app developers, but not perfectly, and still not widely. Mainstream mobile app developers are only just now learning to embrace more of these elements of success, and the enterprise is even slower. Based on <a href="http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends">Indeed.com's top-10 job trends</a>, however, the enterprise is clearly waking up to these needs, hiring droves of developers with HTML5 and other related mobile experience.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In sum, they have time, but they need to get moving on emulating Web companies. Now.</p>
<p><em>Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com">Shutterstock</a>.</em></p>
                    ]]></description>
                <link>http://readwrite.com/2013/01/23/forrester-enterprises-must-look-to-web-for-mobile-success</link>
                <guid>http://readwrite.com/2013/01/23/forrester-enterprises-must-look-to-web-for-mobile-success</guid>
                <category>Forrester</category>
                <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
                <author>Matt Asay</author>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>

