Home Digg: We Were Not Gaming Our Own Algorithm, Just Testing It

Digg: We Were Not Gaming Our Own Algorithm, Just Testing It

Yesterday, Digg power userLtGenPanda spotted some rather odd activity on the social bookmarking site. While looking into how the new Digg algorithm changed the makeup of the site’s front page, he noticed that sites that a number of new sites that never made the front page before were suddenly very prominent on Digg. After further investigation, LtGenPanda spotted a group of 159 suspicious users with names like ‘dd1’ and ‘diggerz29′ that were systematically digging stories from major sites – either by hand or algorithmically. Once he made Digg aware of these accounts, these users’ activity stopped immediately.

It took a while for Digg to react to these allegations that it was potentially gaming its own system for the benefit of its publishing partners, but the company just posted the following explanation on its blog:

As with many sites, we continuously run tests on the site to expose vulnerabilities in our own security. In this case, we did have a number of our internal test accounts Digging content from the Upcoming section of the site. We learned a great deal about some vulnerabilities in how users can inappropriately Digg stories into the home page. We have already made some changes over the last few weeks and are going to be making some other changes to the site this week to address a few of the issues we found. Similar to how good security companies try to break their own security, we have always tested and will always run tests to find spam vulnerabilities on Digg.

Most importantly, we should have been forthright with our community about our testing efforts and we’ll certainly do so in the future. Rest assured that Digg does not in any way receive financial gain from this activity and the accounts were not used to submit any content.

Events like this are obviously not helping Digg, as it is going through enough internal turmoil already. One of the company’s biggest challenges right now is getting its users to trust the service again. The fact that many of its users suspected that the company was gaming its own algorithm to help large publishers shows that Digg still has a long way to go to regain its users trust.

Digg also just announced that it plans to bring the ‘bury’ feature back to the site in the next few weeks and introduce an image and video filter, as well as breaking news module that will show highlight breaking news stories before they hit the front page.

About ReadWrite’s Editorial Process

The ReadWrite Editorial policy involves closely monitoring the tech industry for major developments, new product launches, AI breakthroughs, video game releases and other newsworthy events. Editors assign relevant stories to staff writers or freelance contributors with expertise in each particular topic area. Before publication, articles go through a rigorous round of editing for accuracy, clarity, and to ensure adherence to ReadWrite's style guidelines.

Get the biggest tech headlines of the day delivered to your inbox

    By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Tech News

    Explore the latest in tech with our Tech News. We cut through the noise for concise, relevant updates, keeping you informed about the rapidly evolving tech landscape with curated content that separates signal from noise.

    In-Depth Tech Stories

    Explore tech impact in In-Depth Stories. Narrative data journalism offers comprehensive analyses, revealing stories behind data. Understand industry trends for a deeper perspective on tech's intricate relationships with society.

    Expert Reviews

    Empower decisions with Expert Reviews, merging industry expertise and insightful analysis. Delve into tech intricacies, get the best deals, and stay ahead with our trustworthy guide to navigating the ever-changing tech market.